Blogging at Hound of Heaven starts
here...
I fled Him,
down the nights and down the days;
I fled Him, down the arches of the years;
Of my own mind; and in the midst of tears
I hid from
Him, and under running laughter.
Up vistaed hopes I sped;
And shot, precipitated,
From those
strong Feet that followed, followed after.
But with unhurrying chase,
And unperturbèd pace,
Deliberate
speed, majestic instancy,
They beat – and a Voice beat
More instant than the Feet –
“All things
betray thee, who betrayest Me.”
Francis
Thompson published The Hound of Heaven,
of which this is the opening stanza, in 1893. At the age of 34 he was emerging
from a profound crisis. Born in Preston
to a doctor and a mother who died young, he had received a good education at
Ushaw, the Catholic college in Durham, but rebelled when required by his father
to study medicine and took himself off to London. I’ve little doubt the early
loss of his mother caught up with him here. He was soon reduced to living on
the street selling matches and calling cabs. After three years of destitution,
neuralgia and opium addiction, he was rescued first by a sympathetic prostitute
and then by the publisher Wilfred Meynell who recognised the quality of work
Thompson had sent him. Meynell’s wife Alice, the celebrated poet and
suffragist, cared for Thompson as his health was restored and introduced him to
writers in her circle including George Meredith and Wilfred Scawen Blunt. Nearly
two decades of creativity followed before his death from tuberculosis in 1907.
The language of
the poem is dated now (Thompson could not have foreseen the Titanic disaster)
but The Hound of Heaven has enjoyed
wide fame: Chesterton, Wilde, Tolkien and CS Lewis were admirers, Daphne du
Maurier quoted it in Rebecca, the
Supreme Court of the USA also quoted it in enforcing school desegregation in
1955: Richard Burton made a recording which is preserved on YouTube, and a few
lines were even recited in an episode of ‘Inspector Morse’.
In calling
this site Hound of Heaven I am not, needless to say, claiming identification with Christ! I have
borrowed from Thompson for a number of reasons.
Firstly, I like the reversal of expectation he has conjured up, replacing the usual bothering-God
approach to prayer with instead being bothered,
being pursued, even being afraid. It gives a guarantee of the kind of compelling
experience also found in John Donne. Batter my heart, three-person'd God, for you /As yet but
knock, breathe, shine, and seek to mend;
This immediacy and freshness is born out of the violence of the language – the jolt set up by the enjambment of precipitated and Adown: the paradox present in unhurrying chase.
I am drawn as
well to Thompson’s psychological
awareness – my own mind can feel at times like a dark underground with - who
knows - a Minotaur or two hiding there. I wonder if he read William James, whose pragmatic
approach to knowing was evident in The Principles of Psychology in 1890. “Anything short
of God is not rational”, James wrote in Reflex
Action and Theism. “Anything more than
God is not possible".
It becomes clear that Thompson inhabited this same set of boundaries when the Hound shocks the reader with a coruscating truth at the end of the stanza. “You’ll find the whole world feels against you, if you cannot bring yourself to acknowledge me.” All the paranoia and despair one expects from leading a life of Dickensian horror is this line. At the culmination of the poem 167 lines later, the Hound reveals the truth of love, laying bare the poet’s projection of his own fear and hostility in much the same manner as George Herbert’s conclusion to Love Bade Me Welcome. “Ah, fondest, blindest, weakest, / I am He Whom thou seekest! ”
It becomes clear that Thompson inhabited this same set of boundaries when the Hound shocks the reader with a coruscating truth at the end of the stanza. “You’ll find the whole world feels against you, if you cannot bring yourself to acknowledge me.” All the paranoia and despair one expects from leading a life of Dickensian horror is this line. At the culmination of the poem 167 lines later, the Hound reveals the truth of love, laying bare the poet’s projection of his own fear and hostility in much the same manner as George Herbert’s conclusion to Love Bade Me Welcome. “Ah, fondest, blindest, weakest, / I am He Whom thou seekest! ”
A hound is of
course an unlikely image of Christ, albeit a dog with feet instead of paws, a
dog that also speaks. John O’Conor, a Jesuit contemporary of Thompson’s, found it
unsettling. “The name is strange. It startles one at first. It is so bold, so
new, so fearless. It does not attract, rather the reverse.” Dogs do get a bad
name in the bible: they’re dirty, disgraceful and dangerous. Having lived in
Africa, I know this to be the general case with dogs, outside the pooch-loving
societies such as our own. That said, I live with a lurcher – that’s him in the
painting – and I am indebted to him for lessons in loyalty, patience and… doggedness. I am also referencing the
Dominicans via the old Latin pun, domini
canes – dogs of the lord. It is among them that I have enjoyed a
level-headed and inspiring introduction to Catholicism.
In future
posts I will be reflecting on the history, culture and practice of all kinds of
Christianity in our times, reviewing books, commenting on items in the press, and
sharing inspiration. Coming up soon, reviews of –
God is Watching You: how the fear of God
makes us human by the biologist and political scientist Dominic Johnson.
Linda Woodhead and Andrew Brown’s That Was The Church That Was: how the Church of England lost the English people.
Judas: the troubling history of the renegade apostle by author and journalist Peter Stanford
Linda Woodhead and Andrew Brown’s That Was The Church That Was: how the Church of England lost the English people.
Judas: the troubling history of the renegade apostle by author and journalist Peter Stanford
Being a Beast, the account
of living like a wild animal undertaken by former barrister and fellow
Sheffielder, Charles Foster
No comments:
Post a Comment